Influence of nano-silica and nano-ferrite particles on mechanical and durability of sustainable concrete: A review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Because cement is the primary component of concrete, the production of concrete results in a significant amount of carbon dioxide emissions. Concrete, thus, has an impact on the environment. Concrete may undergo a change in its nanostructure if it contains even a trace number of nanoparticles (NPs). Constructions made of concrete would be more long-lasting and would have a smaller impact on the environment. Researchers know very little about NPs before they are utilized, and the findings of their investigations have been inconsistent despite the fact that a large number of studies have been conducted. In contrast to the inclusion of metals, NPs, particularly nano-silica (NS) and nano-ferrite (NF), have garnered a lot of attention. Due to the fact that NPs perform more effectively in concrete than metal complexes. To evaluate bids, it is essential to provide background information on the most common methods for the manufacture and fabrication of nanomaterials. The parameters that influence the behavior of NPs in cement-based materials have also been the subject of extensive research. There are also processes for mixing and dispersion, as well as super-plasticizers and nanoparticle agglomeration. The mechanical properties of mixtures containing NPs are also assessed. This encompasses modulus of elasticity, splitting tensile strength, compressive strength, and flexural strength. An assessment is conducted to ascertain the penetration of chloride ions in water, permeability, and fire resistance. This study examines various methods for dispersing NS and NF particles to reduce the probability of agglomeration. The investigation also examines how the buildup of NS particles affects the properties of nano-modified concrete. The study revealed that augmenting the nanoparticle substitution by 3–5% can enhance compressive strength. The hydration process is enhanced by extensively disseminated NPs, which also provide a denser microstructure. The incorporation of NF into concrete enhances tensile strength, permeability, and durability, even at concentrations as minimal as 2%. The graphical abstract encapsulates the research conducted in this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".