Air Shepherd: Trajectory Prediction-Based Target Localization and Circumnavigation in Cluttered Environments
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a trajectory prediction-based target localization and circumnavigation pattern for cluttered three-dimensional environments, which is more realistic and suitable for more complex environments than traditional patterns. The main work of the paper consists of two parts: tracking based on trajectory prediction and circumnavigation based on broadcast information. On the one hand, the tracking Autonomous Aerial vehicle (AAV) obtains target trajectory prediction based on the B-spline curve, and then achieves target localization and tracking through front-end search and back-end optimization. On the other hand, without communicating with each other, a distributed control strategy is presented so that the multiple circumnavigation AAVs can achieve target circumnavigation and reciprocal avoidance by only observing the status of adjacent AAVs. In the simulation, obstacle avoidance vehicles moving freely at different speeds are selected as targets in two scenarios and the simulation results are given to verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Furthermore, a hardware-in-the-loop experiment and a overall system validation experiment are designed to verify the feasibility of the algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it