MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409129025 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb974

AT 2020nov: Evidence for Disk Reprocessing in a Rare Tidal Disruption Event

2025· article· en· W4409129025 on OpenAlexafffund
N. Earl, K. Decker French, E. Ramírez-Ruiz, Katie Auchettl, S. I. Raimundo, Kyle W. Davis, Megan Masterson, I. Arcavi, Wenbin Lu, Vivienne Baldassare, D. A. Coulter, Thomas de Boer, M. R. Drout, Hannah Dykaar, R. J. Foley, C. Gall, Hua Gao, M. E. Huber, D. O. Jones, Danial Langeroodi, Chien-Cheng Lin, E. A. Magnier, Brenna Mockler, Margaret E. Verrico

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersPlanetary Science DivisionInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesScience and Technology Facilities CouncilSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemPAZY FoundationUniversity of California, Los AngelesStockholms UniversitetNuclear Safety and Security CommissionScience Mission DirectorateUniversity of TorontoMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoQueen's UniversityCanada Research ChairsKavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa BarbaraDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronUnited States-Israel Binational Science FoundationGordon and Betty Moore FoundationQueen's University BelfastNational Science FoundationUK Research and InnovationNational Central UniversityVillum FondenLos Alamos National LaboratoryCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityUniversity of WashingtonJohns Hopkins UniversityIllinois Space Grant ConsortiumNASA Exoplanet Science InstituteJet Propulsion LaboratoryUniversity of California, Santa CruzHeising-Simons FoundationSpace Telescope Science InstituteW. M. Keck FoundationEuropean CommissionCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationDavid and Lucile Packard FoundationNational Centre for Supercomputing ApplicationsUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignMichigan State UniversityTrinity College DublinNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDurham UniversitySmithsonian Institution
KeywordsPhysicsEvent (particle physics)AstrophysicsAstronomyAstrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present a detailed analysis of AT 2020nov, a tidal disruption event (TDE) in the center of its host galaxy, located at a redshift of z = 0.083. AT 2020nov exhibits unique features, including double-peaked Balmer emission lines, a broad UV/optical flare, and a peak log luminosity in the extreme-ultraviolet (EUV) estimated at ∼ 45.6 6 − 0.33 + 0.10 erg s − 1 . A late-time X-ray flare was also observed, reaching an absorbed luminosity of 1.67 × 1043 erg s−1 approximately 300 days after the UV/optical peak. Multiwavelength coverage, spanning optical, UV, X-ray, and mid-infrared (MIR) bands, reveals a complex spectral energy distribution (SED) that includes MIR flaring indicative of dust echoes, suggesting a dust covering fraction consistent with typical TDEs. Spectral modeling indicates the presence of an extended, quiescent disk around the central supermassive black hole with a radius of ∼ 5.0 6 − 0.77 + 0.59 × 1 0 4 R g . The multicomponent SED model, which includes a significant EUV component, suggests that the primary emission from the TDE is reprocessed by this extended disk, producing the observed optical and MIR features. The lack of strong active galactic nuclei signatures in the host galaxy, combined with the quiescent disk structure, highlights AT 2020nov as a rare example of a TDE occurring in a galaxy with a dormant but extended preexisting accretion structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207