Multi-Robot Reliable Navigation in Uncertain Topological Environments With Graph Attention Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies the multi-robot reliable navigation problem in uncertain topological networks, which aims at maximizing the robot team's on-time arrival probabilities in the face of road network uncertainties. The uncertainty in these networks stems from the unknown edge traversability, which is only revealed to the robot upon its arrival at the edge's starting node. Existing approaches often struggle to adapt to real-time network topology changes, making them unsuitable for varying topological environments. To address the challenge, we reformulate the problem into a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) framework and introduce the Dynamic Adaptive Graph Embedding method to capture the evolving nature of the navigation task. We further enhance each robot's policy learning process by integrating deep reinforcement learning with Graph Attention Networks (GATs), leveraging self-attention to focus on critical graph features. The proposed approach, namely Multi-robot Adaptive Navigation via Graph Attention-based Reinforcement learning (MANGAR) employs the generalized policy gradient algorithm to optimize the robots' real-time decision-making process iteratively. We compare the performance of MANGAR with state-of-the-art reliable navigation algorithms as well as Canadian traveller problem solutions in a range of canonical transportation networks, demonstrating improved adaptability and performance in uncertain topological networks. Additionally, real-world experiments with two robots navigating within a self-constructed indoor environment with uncertain topological structures demonstrate MANGAR's practicality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".