Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pour comprendre l’écho de la théologie de la libération au Québec, il faut non seulement retrouver le climat effervescent au Québec et en Amérique latine à l’époque, mais également identifier les passeurs qui ont permis aux développements théologiques qui travaillaient l’Amérique latine de s’enraciner au Québec. Au premier chef, cette circulation des idées est le fait des missionnaires, notamment des prêtres diocésains oeuvrant en Amérique latine, mais en particulier des missionnaires appartenant à des ordres religieux (jésuites, oblats de Marie-Immaculée, prêtres des missions étrangères) qui dirigeaient des centres de formation (Centre justice et foi et Centre Saint-Pierre) et des organes de diffusion au Québec (revues Relations et Missions étrangères ). Ces lieux de diffusion faisaient partie d’une nébuleuse plus vaste qui incluait les centres universitaires, la diaspora latino-américaine, en particulier chilienne, et qui étaient soutenus par des institutions, en particulier l’Entraide Missionnaire et la Conférence catholique canadienne et son comité des affaires sociales et la Commission pour l’Amérique latine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".