MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409132844 · doi:10.35445/alishlah.v17i1.6695

Mapping of Religious Moderation Literature in Higher Education: A Bibliometric Review

2025· review· en· W4409132844 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAL-ISHLAH Jurnal Pendidikan · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and Radicalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModerationPsychologySociologySocial scienceSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Religious moderation has become a critical focus in higher education, particularly in fostering social harmony and inclusive national identity. This study aims to analyze current trends in religious moderation research within the higher education sector and identify opportunities for future research development. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach was utilized, guided by PRISMA protocols to ensure accuracy and relevance. A total of 160 publications were initially gathered from ERIC, Taylor Francis, and Mendeley databases indexed in Scopus. Based on defined inclusion criteria, 23 publications from 2019 to 2024 were selected for in-depth analysis. Bibliometric analysis was conducted using VOSviewer 1.6.20 software. Findings reveal fluctuating trends in religious moderation research, with a notable increase in publications during 2022, likely influenced by contemporary social issues and educational policies. Indonesia emerged as the leading contributor, followed by Jordan and Canada. Predominantly, qualitative and quantitative methodologies were employed. Thematically, research concentrated on radicalism, curriculum development, and religious tolerance. Density mapping further indicates a research gap in the exploration of nationalism within the context of religious moderation. The limited focus on nationalism suggests an opportunity for future research to bridge this gap and reinforce the role of religious moderation in cultivating inclusive national identity within higher education. This study underscores the need for continued and diversified research on religious moderation, emphasizing its potential to promote social cohesion and counter radical ideologies in academic environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmaBibliometrics
Domain: not available · Genre: Review
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationalhigh
gptBibliometrics
Domain: not available · Genre: Review
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Systematic reviewhigh
models splitAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics
Consensus categoriesBibliometrics
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0140.061
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it