White Matter Hyperintensities Precede other Biomarkers in <i>GRN</i> Frontotemporal Dementia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract INTRODUCTION Increased white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) have been reported in genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD) in small studies, but the sequence of WMH abnormalities relative to other biomarkers is unclear. METHODS Using a large dataset (n=763 GENFI2 participants), we measured WMHs and examined them across genetic FTD variants and stages. Cortical and subcortical volumes were parcellated, and serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels were measured. Biomarker progression was assessed with discriminative event-based and regression modeling. RESULTS Symptomatic GRN carriers showed elevated WMHs, primarily in the frontal lobe, while no significant increase was observed in C9orf72 or MAPT carriers. WMH abnormalities preceded NfL elevation, ventricular enlargement, and cortical atrophy. Longitudinally, baseline WMHs predicted subcortical changes, while subcortical volumes did not predict WMH changes, suggesting WMHs may precede neurodegeneration. DISCUSSION WMHs are elevated in a subset of GRN -related FTD. When present, they appear early and should be considered in disease progression models. Highlights Elevated WMH volumes in symptomatic GRN carriers, but not in other mutations. WMH accumulation is mostly observed in the frontal lobe. WMH abnormalities appear early in GRN -FTD, before NfL, atrophy, and ventriculomegaly. Longitudinally, WMH volumes can predict subcortical changes, but not vice versa. WMHs are key early markers in GRN -FTD and should be included in progression models. RESEARCH IN CONTEXT Systematic review We systematically reviewed the literature on white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) using PubMed. While a few small studies reported increased WMHs in GRN mutation carriers, their sample sizes were limited, and they did not assess the timing of WMHs within disease progression or their temporal relationship to other biomarkers. Interpretation We identified a sequence of key biomarkers in GRN -related FTD and demonstrated that WMHs are among the earliest biomarkers, preceding cortical and subcortical atrophy as well as blood biomarkers. This aligns with neuropathological evidence of early white matter involvement in FTLD- GRN . Additionally, using a larger dataset, we validated previous reports of elevated WMHs in GRN carriers, confirming their reliability. Future directions Future studies should integrate WMHs into FTD progression models to enhance early diagnosis. Understanding why only a subset of GRN carriers exhibit high WMH volumes remains a key research priority.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".