MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409146924 · doi:10.1353/acs.2025.a956538

“A Pious Sort of Cruelty”: St. Kateri Tekakwitha and the Interculturation of Torture

2025· article· en· W4409146924 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Catholic Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrueltyTorturesortCriminologyPsychoanalysisPhilosophyLawSociologyPsychologyPolitical scienceMathematicsArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: St. Kateri Tekakwitha (c. 1656–1680), according to her Jesuit missionaries at Kahnawake near Montréal, rapidly attained Christian perfection through severe self-mortification. Her penances bear a striking resemblance to maltreatment suffered by captives in Native “mourning wars.” Several recent scholars have addressed the possible convergence of the indigenous torture ritual inflicted on war captives and Kateri’s penitential self-torture. However, these scholars have declined to admit that a religious syncretism took place between Native and Christian practice around torture. While addressing their well-founded objections, this article suggests that the evidence of Kateri’s self-mortification is best assessed using the framework of interculturation rather than the more restrictive model of syncretism. A rereading of the evidence shows that Kateri Tekakwitha carried out a genuine interculturation, which the Jesuits tacitly approved, of the Native torture ritual as an expression of Native agency in the construction of the new mission community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0090.018
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Catholic StudiesSame topicHistorical and Contemporary Political DynamicsFrench-language works237,207