MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409152282 · doi:10.31219/osf.io/bmtzs_v1

Exploring racket

2025· preprint· en· W4409152282 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rihaan Sana, Karukonda Sanjay Venkat

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPropulsionSuperfluid helium-4SuperfluidityPhysicsAerospace engineeringHeliumCondensed matter physicsAtomic physicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the conceptual design, architectural framework, and theoretical validation of AETHER (Advanced Emissionless Thrust using Helium Ejection and Recovery), a non-combustion propulsion system designed to bridge the gap between high-thrust chemical engines and highly efficient electric propulsion for deep-space exploration. Traditional space propulsion is fundamentally constrained by chemical bond thermodynamics, limiting specific impulse to under 450 seconds and incurring significant propellant mass fractions. To circumvent these limitations, the AETHER architecture capitalizes on the unique macroscopic quantum mechanical behaviors of superfluid helium-II maintained at sub-lambda point temperatures. The system's propellant management framework abandons traditional mechanical pumps prone to freezing; instead, it utilizes frictionless thermomechanical capillary pumps (fountain effect) to drive the liquid propellant into the engine chamber, alongside phase-isolated thermal traps to regulate localized Rollin film creep. Within the engine core, the propellant is injected tangentially to establish a spinning liquid vortex. This zero-viscosity fluid tornado acts as a self-healing, sacrificial thermal shield that isolates the cryogenic-grade Inconel/Titanium chamber walls from the ultra-high temperatures of the core plasma. High-frequency electromagnetic energy injection (laser or microwave) continuously ionizes the inner face of the vortex into a high-density plasma, which is subsequently accelerated to supersonic velocities using a contactless, superconducting magnetic de Laval nozzle. To sustain the continuous 8–10 Megawatt electrical demands of the plasma generation and active sub-Kelvin cryocoolers, the spacecraft utilizes a Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP) module driven by a compact fission reactor and a closed-loop Brayton cycle. The reactor is thermally and radiologically isolated from the main cryogenic body via a 50-meter open-lattice carbon-composite boom and a tungsten/lithium-hydride shadow shield. Mathematical modeling and ideal launch simulations validate the performance of a modular, 100,000 kg baseline AETHER spacecraft operating with a propellant mass fraction of 50%. Operating at a nominal mass flow rate of 0.05 kg, the engine generates a substantial absolute thrust of 750 N with an axial exhaust velocity of 15,000 m/s. This yields a calculated specific impulse of 1,529 seconds—representing a 5.5 to 8.3 times of a fuel efficiency multiplier over legacy chemical systems—and delivers a total mission velocity change budget of 10,395 m/s across a continuous burn duration of 11.57 days. These results demonstrate AETHER’s capacity to execute rapid interplanetary transfers and high-precision, vibration-free orbital maneuvering for sensitive scientific payloads, establishing a highly sustainable, zero-emission architecture for 21st-century space exploration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score0.713

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.131 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpacecraft and Cryogenic TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207