scTrans: Sparse attention powers fast and accurate cell type annotation in single-cell RNA-seq data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cell type annotation is crucial in single-cell RNA sequencing data analysis because it enables significant biological discoveries and deepens our understanding of tissue biology. Given the high-dimensional and highly sparse nature of single-cell RNA sequencing data, most existing annotation tools focus on highly variable genes to reduce dimensionality and computational load. However, this approach inevitably results in information loss, potentially weakening the model's generalization performance and adaptability to novel datasets. To mitigate this issue, we developed scTrans, a single cell Transformer-based model, which employs sparse attention to utilize all non-zero genes, thereby effectively reducing the input data dimensionality while minimizing information loss. We validated the speed and accuracy of scTrans by performing cell type annotation on 31 different tissues within the Mouse Cell Atlas. Remarkably, even with datasets nearing a million cells, scTrans efficiently perform cell type annotation in limited computational resources. Furthermore, scTrans demonstrates strong generalization capabilities, accurately annotating cells in novel datasets and generating high-quality latent representations, which are essential for precise clustering and trajectory analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".