MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409158425 · doi:10.1145/3690624.3709230

Dynamic Deep Clustering of High-Dimensional Directional Data via Hyperspherical Embeddings with Bayesian Nonparametric Mixtures

2025· article· en· W4409158425 on OpenAlexaff
Zhiwen Luo, Wentao Fan, Manar Amayri, Nizar Bouguila

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonparametric statisticsCluster analysisComputer scienceBayesian probabilityArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Data miningAlgorithmMathematicsEconometrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clustering high-dimensional directional data (i.e., L2 normalized vectors) presents significant challenges due to the intricate spherical representations of latent embeddings and the limitations of classical (non-deep) clustering techniques. Moreover, dynamically inferring the number of clusters remains a fundamental issue in existing deep clustering methods, especially those involving complex model-selection criteria. This paper addresses these challenges by introducing a novel deep nonparametric clustering framework that employs hyperspherical latent embeddings within a Variational Autoencoder architecture, enhanced by an infinite Von Mises-Fisher Mixture Model as a dynamic prior. This approach enables automatic adaptation of cluster numbers during training, eliminating the need for predefined clusters and traditional model selection processes. Our scalable architecture effectively integrates In-vMFMM with hyperspherical embeddings to tackle the complexities of directional data. Utilizing a joint training strategy, our method alternates between updating neural network parameters and adjusting mixture model priors via nonparametric variational Bayes. Empirical evaluations on benchmark datasets, including complex ImageNet-50, demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art deep nonparametric clustering methods. It also robustly estimates the number of clusters, showcasing its effectiveness and versatility in handling high-dimensional directional data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBayesian Methods and Mixture ModelsFrench-language works237,207