MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409158651 · doi:10.1016/j.jth.2025.102044

Comparing pedestrian and cyclist injuries from falls and collisions in British Columbia, Canada: Frequencies and population characteristics

2025· article· en· W4409158651 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Michael Branion-Calles, Andrea Godfreyson, Kate Berniaz, Neil Arason, Shannon Erdelyi, Meghan Winters, Kay Teschke, Fahra Rajabali, Marianne Harris, Jeffrey R. Brubacher

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Transport & Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInjury Epidemiology and Prevention
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityBC Children's HospitalVancouver General HospitalProvincial Health Services AuthoritySimon Fraser UniversityMinistry of HealthMinistry of Transportation of OntarioPublic Health OntarioUniversity of British ColumbiaIsland Health
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMinistry of Health, British Columbia
KeywordsPedestrianPopulationGeographyAeronauticsTransport engineeringPhysical medicine and rehabilitationEngineeringDemographyMedicineSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Walking and cycling offer health benefits but carry injury risks. Traditional road safety datasets often exclude pedestrian and cyclist falls, despite emerging evidence that injuries from falls occur more frequently than collisions with motor vehicles. This research compared the frequency of pedestrian and cyclist injuries from falls versus collisions using hospital admissions data from a linked database of road traffic injuries in British Columbia, Canada, which combined hospital admissions, and sociodemographic information from 2015 to 2019. Additionally, we examined differences in injury severity and population characteristics between those injured in falls versus collisions. Of 6807 pedestrian hospital admissions, 68.8 % were from falls—2.3 times higher than motor vehicle collisions (29.2 %). Among 2409 cyclist admissions, falls accounted for 48.6 %–1.8 times higher than motor vehicle collisions (27.6 %). More severe injuries (MAIS3+) occurred less frequently in falls (25.0 % pedestrians, 17.9 % cyclists) than in collisions with motor vehicles (39.7 %, 27.4 %). We also found that falls disproportionately happen to older adults, females, higher-income individuals, and rural residents with more pronounced differences in pedestrians. Our analysis revealed that pedestrian and cyclist falls are major contributors to the burden of road traffic injury and emphasizes the need for their inclusion in road safety surveillance and research. Reliance on datasets that exclude falls, or failing to consider falls as a road safety issue, can potentially hinder the development of infrastructure and built environment design solutions aimed at reducing the frequency and severity of fall injuries to pedestrians and cyclists. • We counted pedestrian and cyclist injuries from falls compared to collisions. • Pedestrian falls were 2.3 times more frequent than collisions with motor vehicles. • Cyclist falls were 1.8 times more frequent than collisions with motor vehicles. • Older adults, women, higher-income, and rural residents fall more often. • Road traffic injury definitions should include falls for surveillance and research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Transport & HealthSame topicInjury Epidemiology and PreventionFrench-language works237,207