MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409162593 · doi:10.1093/imrn/rnaf075

Hecke Operators for Curves Over Non-Archimedean Local Fields and Related Finite Rings

2025· article· en· W4409162593 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander Braverman, David Kazhdan, Alexander Polishchuk, K Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Mathematics Research Notices · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
Topicadvanced mathematical theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsPure mathematicsFinite fieldAlgebra over a fieldDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We study Hecke operators associated with curves over a non-archimedean local field $K$ and over the rings $O/\mathfrak{m}^{N}$, where $O\subset K$ is the ring of integers. Our main result is commutativity of a certain “small” local Hecke algebra over $O/\mathfrak{m}^{N}$, associated with a connected split reductive group $G$ such that $[G,G]$ is simply connected. The proof uses a Hecke algebra associated with $G(K(\!(t)\!))$ and a global argument involving $G$-bundles on curves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.469
Teacher spread0.390 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Mathematics Research NoticesSame topicadvanced mathematical theoriesFrench-language works237,207