MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409163377 · doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2025.03.016

Effect of powder preparation on degradation behavior and cytotoxicity of sintered porous biodegradable FeMnC alloys for biomedical applications

2025· article· en· W4409163377 on OpenAlex
Abdelhakim Cherqaoui, Francesco Copes, Carlo Paternoster, Simon Gélinas, P. Mengucci, Carl Blais, Diego Mantovani

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Material Science and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsMinistère de l'Économie, de l’Innovation et des Exportations du Québec
KeywordsDegradation (telecommunications)Materials sciencePorosityCytotoxicityChemical engineeringMetallurgyComposite materialChemistryComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• The mixture of a mechanically-milled prealloyed and blended FeMnC powders led to enhanced degradation rates of porous FeMnC sintered alloys;. • Increasing the proportion of the prealloyed powder reduced Mn evaporation, resulting in the formation of up to 60 wt.% of austenite in samples sintered from a mixture containing 75 wt.% of this powder;. • A complex microstructure, consisting of ferrite, austenite, and martensite, was observed in samples sintered from mixtures containing up to 50 wt.% prealloyed milled powder;. • All sintered samples demonstrated interesting cell viability exceeding 80 % at 1 % extract dilution after 24 h of cell viability test, and were non-hemolytic, with a hemolysis <1 %. Biodegradable implants have emerged in biomedical applications, particularly for orthopedic fixations, cardiovascular stents, and tissue engineering scaffolds. Unlike permanent implants, they are designed to degrade and be reabsorbed after implantation in the body, mitigating the need for additional surgeries and reducing associated complications. In particular, Fe-Mn-C alloys constitute a new class of promising metallic materials for medical applications due to their outstanding mechanical properties and their biological performances. This study focuses on improving the degradation rates and cytotoxicity of sintered Fe-Mn-C alloys produced using the powder metallurgy process. To evaluate the impact of different powder preparation methods on material properties, two types of powders were used: (1) MX, prepared by mixing Fe, Mn, and C powders for 1 h; and (2) MM, obtained by mechanically milling the same powders for 10 h. Four mixtures with varying proportions of MX and MM were prepared. Two groups of samples were produced: one entirely from MX (A0), and another containing MM at 25 wt.% (A25), 50 wt.% (A50), and 75 wt.% (A75). All samples exhibited a complex microstructure comprising ferrite, martensite, and residual austenite. Degradation behavior assessment in Hanks’ solution over 14 days showed that adding MM increased the degradation rate, from around 0.04 mmpy for A0 to 0.12 mmpy for A25. Notably, all samples showed similar cell viability, in the range of 83 %–89 % for 1 % extract dilution, and were non-hemolytic, with a hemolysis percentage below 1 %.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it