Verde: Las transfiguraciones del paisaje en la pintura del Virreinato del Perú
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El tema del paisaje en el en el Virreinato del Perú mostró bastante desinterés en la historiografía, incluso ante la evidencia que nos muestra que, a partir de la segunda mitad del siglo XVII, el paisaje ocupó un espacio de importancia en las composiciones pictóricas virreinales. Esto se debió probablemente a la incapacidad de acomodar estas representaciones dentro de los parámetros de la epistemología tradicional del paisaje. Utilizando como marco teórico la noción de transfiguración, en este artículo queremos reflexionar y concentrarnos sobre los procesos intelectuales, culturales y materiales que incidieron en la representación del paisaje en el Perú. Prestamos particular atención a los fenómenos de los desplazamientos humanos, tanto físicos como mentales, recurriendo a la noción de transitus y a los tópicos de la peregrinatio vitae y la peregrinatio spiritualis, como algunos detonantes de la transfiguración.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".