MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409169747 · doi:10.1080/14753820.2025.2465044

Verde: Las transfiguraciones del paisaje en la pintura del Virreinato del Perú

2025· article· es· W4409169747 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Spanish Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Architecture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El tema del paisaje en el en el Virreinato del Perú mostró bastante desinterés en la historiografía, incluso ante la evidencia que nos muestra que, a partir de la segunda mitad del siglo XVII, el paisaje ocupó un espacio de importancia en las composiciones pictóricas virreinales. Esto se debió probablemente a la incapacidad de acomodar estas representaciones dentro de los parámetros de la epistemología tradicional del paisaje. Utilizando como marco teórico la noción de transfiguración, en este artículo queremos reflexionar y concentrarnos sobre los procesos intelectuales, culturales y materiales que incidieron en la representación del paisaje en el Perú. Prestamos particular atención a los fenómenos de los desplazamientos humanos, tanto físicos como mentales, recurriendo a la noción de transitus y a los tópicos de la peregrinatio vitae y la peregrinatio spiritualis, como algunos detonantes de la transfiguración.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it