MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409170815 · doi:10.23977/jaip.2025.080116

Research on the application of artificial intelligence and multi-scale image fusion technology to pedestrian detection in complex street view

2025· article· en· W4409170815 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Artificial Intelligence Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutomated Road and Building Extraction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPedestrian detectionPedestrianArtificial intelligenceComputer visionComputer scienceScale (ratio)Image fusionImage (mathematics)EngineeringTransport engineeringGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the increasing face imaging data and the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, computer-aided monitoring systems are crucial for pedestrian detection in dense street view. However, due to occlusion and small pedestrian scale, pedestrian false alarms and missed detection problems become more and more serious. Therefore, this paper proposes a pedestrian detection model, YOLOv10s-pedestrian. Firstly, CA attention is introduced to redesign the MBConv module, resulting in an efficient MB-CANet backbone for pedestrian feature extraction, enhancing the accurate localization of densely occluded pedestrians. Secondly, a novel C2FN structure was created to reduce the number of parameters while improving the model's accuracy. Additionally, inspired by the BiFPN feature fusion concept, a Bi-C2FN-FPN network structure is proposed to effectively fuse features from different depth sources, strengthening feature fusion and improving pedestrian detection accuracy. Finally, the MPDIOU loss function replaces the original CIoU loss function to enhance anchor box localization. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model achieves a mAP50 of 95.6% on the WiderPerson pedestrian detection dataset, which is a 6.1% improvement over the original model, with a recall rate of 86.2%, showcasing excellent detection performance. Compared to several mainstream object detection models, the proposed model also exhibits superior performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.670
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Artificial Intelligence PracticeSame topicAutomated Road and Building ExtractionFrench-language works237,207