MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409173091 · doi:10.1186/s13049-025-01370-x

Creation and validation of a roadside rescue skills scale for training pre-hospital medical teams: the RoadRes-Q scale

2025· article· en· W4409173091 on OpenAlexaff
Lavabre Killien, Chenu Mathilde, Gransagne Adrien

Bibliographic record

VenueScandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies
Canadian institutionsQuebec Society for the Protection of Plants
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCronbach's alphaMedicineScale (ratio)Delphi methodMultidisciplinary approachMedical emergencyHealth careReliability (semiconductor)Patient safetyNursingPsychometricsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Road traffic injuries are the leading cause of death among young people worldwide. While advances in vehicle safety have reduced some of the risks, the speed and quality of pre-hospital care are critical to prevent fatalities. In France, patients are cared for by medical teams and firefighters who must work together as closely as possible to ensure the best possible survival rate. However, there is a lack of standardised scales to assess the performance of these multidisciplinary teams. This study aimed to create and validate a roadside rescue skills assessment scale, the RoadRes-Q scale, for healthcare teams. METHODS: We used a two-round Delphi method to develop the RoadRes-Q scale. A panel of 9 international roadside rescue experts, including 7 firefighters and 2 engineers in road rescue equipment, agreed to participate. The scale covers five key areas: healthcare provider protection, site securing, vehicle securing, first aid delivery, and patient extrication. The final version was tested during two one-day simulation-based training sessions, each involving 22 participants: 6 healthcare staff, 14 firefighters, and 2 simulated victims. Assessors completed the scale during and after each scenario, focusing on internal consistency and inter-observer reliability. RESULTS: The RoadRes-Q scale consists of 60 items. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's alpha of 0.86), indicating that items were non-redundant and consistently measured the required competencies. However, inter-observer reliability was low (intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.48), suggesting variability between assessors. Satisfaction among participants to the simulation-based training courses was high, and their knowledge increased. CONCLUSIONS: The RoadRes-Q scale proved to be a valid and reliable scale for evaluating both technical and non-technical skills. While internal consistency was strong, improvements are needed in inter-observer reliability. Structured training for assessors and video-based assessments could enhance reproducibility. The RoadRes-Q scale has the potential for assessing the quality and safety of care provided by healthcare teams in roadside rescue situations. REGISTRATION: As the study did not involve interventional research or patient participation, ethics committee approval was not required, but it received approval from the scientific referents of the Faculty of Medicine of Poitiers, and participants provided informed consent for using their anonymised data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score0.499

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency MedicineSame topicTrauma and Emergency Care StudiesFrench-language works237,207