A graph neural network surrogate model for multi-objective fluid-acoustic shape optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents a graph neural network (GNN)-based surrogate modeling approach for multi-objective fluid-acoustic shape optimization. The proposed GNN model transforms mesh-based simulations into a computational graph, enabling steady-state prediction of pressure and velocity fields around varying geometries subjected to different operating conditions. We employ signed distance functions to implicitly encode geometries on unstructured nodes represented by the graph neural network. By integrating these functions with computational mesh information into the GNN architecture, our approach effectively captures geometric variations and learns their influence on flow behavior. The trained graph neural network achieves high prediction accuracy for aerodynamic quantities, with median relative errors of 0.5%–1% for pressure and velocity fields across 200 test cases. The predicted flow field is utilized to extract fluid force coefficients and boundary layer velocity profiles, which are then integrated into an acoustic prediction model to estimate far-field noise. This enables the direct integration of the coupled fluid-acoustic analysis in the multi-objective shape optimization algorithm, where the airfoil geometry is optimized to simultaneously minimize trailing-edge noise and maximize aerodynamic performance. Results show that the optimized airfoil achieves a 13.9% reduction in overall sound pressure level (15.82 dBA) while increasing lift by 7.2% under fixed operating conditions. Optimization was also performed under a different set of operating conditions to assess the model’s robustness and demonstrate its effectiveness across varying flow conditions. In addition to its adaptability, our GNN-based surrogate model, integrated with the shape optimization algorithm, exhibits a computational speed-up of three orders of magnitude compared to full-order online optimization applications while maintaining high accuracy. This work demonstrates the potential of GNNs as an efficient data-driven approach for fluid-acoustic shape optimization via adaptive morphing of structures. • Graph neural network-based surrogate model developed for shape optimization. • Integrated with implicit representations to enable shape morphing. • Predicts flow field and boundary layer properties accurately and efficiently. • Accurate prediction of trailing-edge noise acoustic levels based on flow fields. • Demonstration for fluid-acoustic airfoil shape optimization for optimal geometries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".