The guinea pig serves as an alternative model to study human preimplantation development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Preimplantation development is an important window of human embryogenesis. However, ethical constraints and the limitations involved in studying human embryos often necessitate the use of alternative model systems. Here we identify the guinea pig as a promising small animal model to study human preimplantation development. Using single-cell RNA-sequencing, we generated an atlas of guinea pig preimplantation development, revealing its close resemblance to early human embryogenesis in terms of the timing of compaction, early-, mid- and late-blastocyst formation, and implantation, and the spatio-temporal expression of key lineage markers. We also show conserved roles of Hippo, MEK-ERK and JAK-STAT signalling. Furthermore, multi-species analysis highlights the spatio-temporal expression of conserved and divergent genes during preimplantation development and pluripotency. The guinea pig serves as a valuable animal model for advancing preimplantation development and stem cell research, and can be leveraged to better understand the longer-term impact of early exposures on offspring outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".