MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409179108 · doi:10.1080/17434440.2025.2489493

Focused ultrasound: focused on tremor

2025· review· en· W4409179108 on OpenAlexaff
Benjamin Davidson, Andrés M. Lozano

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Medical Devices · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUltrasoundPhysical medicine and rehabilitationRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) has emerged as a leading noninvasive therapy for tremor, offering a precise, lesion-based alternative to deep brain stimulation (DBS) and traditional lesioning techniques. By using phased ultrasound arrays to focus energy at intracranial targets, MRgFUS allows for real-time visualization and monitoring, improving safety and efficacy. Initially developed for essential tremor (ET), MRgFUS-VIM-thalamotomy has gained widespread acceptance and is now a first-line option for tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease (TDPD) and other tremor syndromes. AREAS COVERED: This review discusses the fundamental physics of focused ultrasound, key anatomical targets, and the clinical application of MRgFUS thalamotomy, pallidotomy, and subthalamotomy. Skull density ratio (SDR) and energy efficiency are highlighted as crucial factors affecting treatment outcomes. The evolution of MRgFUS as a bilateral treatment, along with the exploration of novel targets such as the pallidothalamic tract, is examined. Additionally, we discuss advancements in FUS neuromodulation, which could complement lesioning by providing temporary or reversible symptom relief. EXPERT OPINION: MRgFUS is poised to further revolutionize tremor treatment with frameless technology, staged bilateral procedures, and the integration of neuromodulation. Future developments may allow for precise, adaptive therapies that enhance both efficacy and patient experience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of Medical DevicesSame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207