Persistent Directed Flag Laplacian (PDFL)-Based Machine Learning for Protein–Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Directionality in molecular and biomolecular networks plays an important role in the accurate representation of the complex, dynamic, and asymmetrical nature of interactions present in protein-ligand binding, signal transduction, and biological pathways. Most traditional techniques of topological data analysis (TDA), such as persistent homology (PH) and persistent Laplacian (PL), overlook this aspect in their standard form. To address this, we present the persistent directed flag Laplacian (PDFL), which incorporates directed flag complexes to account for edges with directionality originated from polarization, gene regulation, heterogeneous interactions, etc. This study marks the first application of PDFL, providing an in-depth analysis of spectral graph theory combined with machine learning. In addition to its superior accuracy and reliability, the PDFL model offers simplicity by requiring only raw inputs without complex data processing. We validated our multikernel PDFL model for its scoring power against other state-of-the-art methods on three popular benchmarks, namely PDBbind v2007, v2013, and v2016. The computational results indicate that the proposed PDFL model outperforms competitors in protein-ligand binding affinity predictions, suggesting that PDFL is a promising tool for protein engineering, drug discovery, and general applications in science and engineering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".