MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409185176 · doi:10.32784/libaac-3463

The Ritual of Tellann: Immortality and Its Refusal in Steven Erikson’s 'Malazan Book of the Fallen'

2025· book-chapter· en· W4409185176 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tjorven Carstens

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient Near East History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmortalityErikson's stages of psychosocial developmentPsychoanalysisPhilosophyArtPsychologyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While Tolkien presents his immortal people, the Elves, as naturally long-lived paragons of culture and community, Canadian fantasy author Steven Erikson follows a different approach to immortality in his Malazan Book of the Fallen (1999–2010), in which he conceptualizes his T’lan Imass as teleologically rather than naturally immortal, becoming so at the cost of social cohesion but supposedly for the benefit of others. Constructing a Nietzschean-Adlerian framework for power relations, this paper examines the narrative rhetoric Erikson employs to communicate his vision of the challenges their teleological immortality entails for the T’lan Imass in a world reluctant to buy into their supposedly altruistic motivation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAncient Near East HistoryFrench-language works237,207