MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409187934 · doi:10.32996/jcsts.2025.7.2.7

Leveraging Hybrid Edge-Cloud Predictive Maintenance in Pharmaceutical MES: An Industry 4.0 Approach Using Big Data

2025· article· en· W4409187934 on OpenAlexaff
Shriprakashan. L. Parapalli, Jithen Shetty

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computer Science and Technology Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBig Data and Business Intelligence
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingPredictive maintenanceBig dataEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionIndustry 4.0Computer sciencePredictive analyticsData scienceData miningEngineeringReliability engineeringArtificial intelligenceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pharmaceutical sector relies on stringent manufacturing environments to safeguard product integrity and uphold regulatory standards. Unexpected equipment failures can lead to costly downtime, regulatory exposure, and compromised quality. To address these challenges, this paper presents an integrated Hybrid Edge-Cloud Predictive Maintenance (HEC-PdM) framework embedded within a Manufacturing Execution System (MES). By combining edge computing for real-time anomaly detection with cloud-based machine learning (ML) analytics, manufacturers can transition from reactive to predictive and prescriptive maintenance strategies. The methodology includes data collection and preprocessing at the edge, federated learning in the cloud, and seamless MES integration to automate maintenance workflows and compliance documentation. Case studies highlight significant benefits, such as a 45% reduction in maintenance costs, minimized downtime, and improved production quality. Finally, the paper discusses future directions, including enhanced security protocols for federated learning, self-adaptive AI systems, and quantum ML to further address the complexities of pharmaceutical manufacturing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.217
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computer Science and Technology StudiesSame topicBig Data and Business IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207