MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409189962 · doi:10.1111/obr.13915

Hyperphagia in Bardet–Biedl syndrome: Pathophysiology, burden, and management

2025· review· en· W4409189962 on OpenAlexaff
Philip L. Beales, Metin Cetiner, Andrea M. Haqq, Jennifer Miller, Ashley H. Shoemaker, Diana Valverde, Miriam Zacchia, Hélène Dollfus

Bibliographic record

VenueObesity Reviews · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCiliopathyBardet–Biedl syndromeQuality of life (healthcare)MedicineObesityMoodDietary managementMetabolic syndromePediatricsInternal medicineEndocrinologyPsychiatryBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) is a rare, genetically heterogeneous, and highly pleiotropic autosomal recessive ciliopathy. Patients typically present with early loss of vision, hyperphagia, severe obesity, learning difficulties, and renal dysfunction. In patients with BBS, dysfunction of the immotile primary cilia in the hypothalamic melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) pathway responsible for controlling energy balance, hunger, and satiety results in severe hyperphagia manifesting in food-seeking behaviors that drive the development of obesity early in childhood. These behaviors have negative impacts on many areas of the lives of patients with BBS and their families/caregivers, including sleep, mood, school/work, and social/family relationships. Additionally, many patients feel stigmatized due to their hyperphagia-associated food-seeking behaviors and the resulting obesity, which exacerbates the impacts of hyperphagia on quality of life. Early identification and management of hyperphagia in patients with BBS is key: mitigating food-seeking and weight gain can improve quality of life and reduce the risk of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases that is increased in patients with BBS. Until recently, the only treatment strategies available were lifestyle and diet modifications. However, targeted treatment with the novel MC4R agonist setmelanotide now offers an effective management option to reduce hyperphagia and weight in patients with BBS, improving overall health and quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObesity ReviewsSame topicGenetic and Kidney Cyst DiseasesFrench-language works237,207