MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409191024 · doi:10.1111/nicc.70028

Nurse‐led evidence‐based quality improvement programme to improve intensive care unit patient sleep quality

2025· article· en· W4409191024 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
W. Wang, Xinyan Cao, Qi Zhang, Chun Cai, Juan Han

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing in Critical Care · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyTongji UniversityHuazhong University of Science and Technology
KeywordsMedicinePsychological interventionNursingSleep (system call)Intensive care unitQuality managementEvidence-based practiceProtocol (science)Intervention (counseling)Promotion (chess)Intensive care medicineManagement systemAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) suffer from significant sleep disturbances, which can negatively impact their healing and overall health. Nurses, as the primary caregivers, need to have expertise in sleep management to ensure better patient outcomes. Implementing nurse-led, evidence-based sleep protocols in ICUs is crucial. AIM: This study aimed to improve ICU patients' sleep quality by developing and implementing a nurse-led, evidence-based SLEEP Bundle, including Sleep initiative, Light control, Eye mask and earplugs usage, Environment noise cancellation and Provision of non-pharmacological (aromatherapy and music therapy) and pharmacological (dexmedetomidine and painkillers) support. METHODS: The Framework of Evidence-based Continuous Quality Improvement and the Ottawa Model of Research Use framework were used to guide the development, implementation and assessment of the SLEEP Bundle. A quasi-experimental study was conducted in a 12-bed surgical intensive care unit (SICU), assessing patient-perceived sleep quality, nurses' self-report knowledge, attitudes and actions regarding patient sleep conditions and nurses' adherence to the interventions. INTERVENTIONS: In order to successfully translate evidence into clinical practice, the protocol was crafted with significant nurse involvement, input in sleep promotion materials and a flexible continuing education component, which provided credits to encourage nurse participation. A sleep-aid kit, complete with non-pharmacological tools, and a system of regular quality control and feedback were integral to the clinical application of the protocol. RESULTS: The intervention significantly enhanced ICU patients' sleep quality, as evidenced by a significant increase in Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire scores from 62 (IQR = 48-72) to 70 (IQR = 62-76) (95% CI [-10.000, -6.000], Z = -6.100, p < .001). Nurses demonstrated a 100% agreement in knowledge items and a significant upsurge in action items following the intervention. Concurrently, adherence to practice standards showed notable improvements in sleep management practices, including enhanced sleep quality assessment, daytime functional exercise support and compliance with environmental regulations, along with increased use of earplugs, eye masks and aromatherapy/music therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the effectiveness and feasibility of a nurse-led sleep management strategy, as demonstrated by improved patient outcomes and increased nurse adherence to sleep promotion interventions. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The significant improvements in sleep quality as well as the increased adherence to evidence-based interventions by nurses suggest that this SLEEP Bundle could be effectively translated to other clinical settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.088
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.088
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing in Critical CareSame topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersFrench-language works237,207