MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409192910 · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-9715-8_27

East-South Globalisation and Africa-India Migrations: Developing a New Research Agenda

2025· book-chapter· en· W4409192910 on OpenAlexaff
Sujata Ramachandran, Abel Chikanda

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational perspectives on migration · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration and Labor Dynamics
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityBalsillie School of International Affairs
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobalizationGeographyDevelopment economicsPolitical scienceEconomic growthEconomic geographyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This chapter examines the ways in which the contemporary economic and political relationships between the continent of Africa and India tied to the East-South centred globalisation have transformed migration trends across these geographies. Following a similar trajectory as China, India has actively sought to build up trade and business linkages with numerous African countries since 2002 using strategies such as the India-Africa Summits. These reconfigured relationships have forged the broad and generative conditions for the deepening of short- and long-term migrations across India and various African countries. Preferential visa regimes are key components of these latest transnational and transregional arrangements. Using available statistics, our analysis underscores the growth and diversification of migratory flows between India and the African continent. Based on a critical assessment of studies on these migrations, we additionally identify existing gaps and offer important directions for future research endeavours. The continuities and discontinuities between the old and new migrations are briefly examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational perspectives on migrationSame topicMigration and Labor DynamicsFrench-language works237,207