Bibliographic record
Abstract
As part of my ongoing research articulating a Metis-feminist theory of rest as resistance, this paper explores the practice of visiting with Land as an act of restful resistance. A theory of rest as resistance responds to the exhausting ways that the settler state attempts to devastate Indigenous communities. This response sees rest not as succumbing to these oppressive powers but as a method to actively resist them. In this paper, I argue that visiting with Land is a practice of rest as resistance as it first refuses colonial and capitalist standards and expectations of what it means to be “productive.” Second, it centres knowledge and relationships not valued by colonial capitalism. Finally, it engages in slow practices of well-being focused on relationality and reciprocity that offer space and freedom to understand ourselves and our communities. I will root my considerations of this resistance in a practice of autotheory that reflects on my own practice of visiting with Land, both in my Métis territories and as visitor in Syilx territory. Understanding this practice of visiting with the Land as restful resistance is essential as it centres and supports the concept that resting is part of the work when we are attempting to build and maintain sustainable communities and activism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.049 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".