MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409199421 · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2025.03.031

Basin-scale production of hyperacidic brines is critical for the formation of high-grade and large-tonnage uranium deposits in sedimentary basins

2025· article· en· W4409199421 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Yumeng Wang, Guoxiang Chi, Sean Bosman

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsGovernment of SaskatchewanUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryStructural basinSedimentary rockUraniumUranium oreTonnageSedimentary basinPetrologyGeomorphologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unconformity-related uranium deposits (URU deposits) in the Proterozoic Athabasca Basin (Canada) represent the largest and richest (with average grades ranging from 0.127 to 19.5 wt% U) U deposits in the world. Fluid inclusion studies and experimental data suggest that the ore-forming fluids of URU deposits are hyperacidic (pH < 3.5), oxidizing basinal brines carrying high concentrations of U (0.2 to 3700 ppm), which are several orders of magnitude higher than ordinary basinal and basement formation waters. While the oxidizing conditions of these fluids are well established, the mechanism responsible for the basin-scale generation of hyperacidic brines remains unknown. This paper aims to address this problem and to explain why the Athabasca Basin is exceptionally endowed with high-grade and large-tonnage uranium deposits. Based on petrographic and infrared hyperspectral logging data indicating basin-wide coexistence of kaolinite and illite in quartz-dominated sandstones, and fluid inclusion data showing high potassium (K) concentrations in diagenetic and ore-forming fluids within the Athabasca Basin, it is proposed that the production of hyperacidic brines resulted from a pervasive diagenetic reaction between K-rich brines and kaolinite: 3kaolinite [Al 2 Si 2 O 5 (OH) 4 ] + 2 K + ↔ 2illite [KAl 3 Si 3 O 10 (OH) 2 ] + 3H 2 O + 2H + . Geochemical modeling of fluid-rock reactions demonstrates that the basin-scale production of hyperacidic brines is achievable when a combination of three specific conditions is satisfied: 1) the presence of a thick package of compositionally mature sandstones, characterized by quartz-dominated framework grains with minimal (<1%) feldspar and the interstitial space filled with kaolinite; 2) the development of K-rich brines through seawater evaporation above the sandstone package; and 3) low fluid/rock ratios, which enable the reaction between kaolinite and K-rich brines to reach equilibrium and produce illite and H + . Recognizing the basin-scale development of hyperacidic brines and the specific conditions entailed offers insights into why the Athabasca Basin is exceptionally endowed with high-grade, large-tonnage U deposits. The conditions of hyperacidic brine production revealed in this study may be used for evaluating the U mineralization potential of other sedimentary basins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeochimica et Cosmochimica ActaSame topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207