Minimally invasive simple hysterectomy in low-risk cervical cancer: a single-arm trial with stopping rules (ENGOT-cx23/MITO/LASH trial)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The oncologic safety of minimally invasive simple hysterectomy in low-risk cervical cancer has not been explored by an adequately powered clinical trial. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate whether minimally invasive simple hysterectomy affects disease-free survival in low-risk early-stage cervical cancer. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Minimally invasive simple hysterectomy represents an oncologically safe approach in selected patients with low-risk cervical cancer. TRIAL DESIGN: This is a single-arm trial with stopping rules. All patients must undergo cervical conization. Patients with clear conization margins or absence of residual macroscopic disease at imaging after conization (re-conization is mandatory if these criteria are not met) are submitted to minimally invasive (laparoscopy or robot-assisted laparoscopy) simple hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy algorithm. Adjuvant therapy is given in case of tumor-involved surgical margins, and/or metastatic lymph nodes, and/or substantial lymphovascular space invasion with depth of stromal infiltration >2/3 (or tumor-free distance ≤3 mm). MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: The major inclusion criteria are: squamous cell carcinoma, human papillomavirus-related adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix; International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 stage IA2-IB1 (≤2 cm) with depth of infiltration ≤10 mm on conization specimen; International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 stage IA2-IB1 (≤2 cm) with depth of infiltration ≤50% at pre-conization magnetic resonance imaging scan or "expert" ultrasound scan. Women are not eligible if they have evidence of metastatic disease, contra-indications to surgery and/or lymph node assessment, or fertility sparing desire. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: The primary end point is 3-year disease-free survival of patients who undergo minimally invasive simple hysterectomy. SAMPLE SIZE: A sample size of 974 patients will give a power of 80% at a significance level of 2.5% (1-sided) to reject the null hypothesis of a 3-year recurrence rate of 2.4%, assuming a 3-year recurrence rate of 1.2%. A maximum of 14 recurrences at 3 years should be observed to reject the null hypothesis. A stopping rule based on the number of recurrences observed at different timepoints will be implemented to avoid a higher recurrence rate with the study procedure. The trial will also be stopped if no recurrences are observed in the first 400 patients followed up for 2 years. ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS: The enrolment will last 60 months. After the surgery, the follow-up time will be ≥3 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06416748) and as ENGOT/MITO trial (ENGOT-cx23).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".