MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409204173 · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2025.123601

Hydraulic and chemical cleaning efficiency for the release of microplastics retained during coagulation/flocculation-ultrafiltration

2025· article· en· W4409204173 on OpenAlexafffund
Tyler A. Malkoske, Pierre R. Bérubé, Robert C. Andrews

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsMicroplasticsFlocculationUltrafiltration (renal)CoagulationChemistryPulp and paper industryEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringChromatographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Increasing coagulant dosage inhibits the release of MPs during hydraulic cleaning. • Dissolution of Al precipitate during chemical cleaning improves the release of MPs. • Cleaning efficiency is comparatively low for 1-5 µm MPs vs. those >5 µm in size. • Cleaning practices are ineffective for eliminating irreversible retention of MPs. • The irreversible retention of MPs could affect long-term membrane performance. Microplastics (MPs) are ubiquitous in global drinking water sources (lakes, rivers), with reported concentrations ranging from 0.5 to >7,500 particles/L. Ultrafiltration (UF), widely applied in drinking water treatment, is anticipated to represent an effective barrier to MPs due to its pore size (0.01-0.1 µm), which can retain MPs of potential health concern. To-date limited studies have reported that MPs may contribute to UF fouling, albeit when considering concentrations up to 10 orders of magnitude higher than those typically observed in source waters. The present study evaluated the retention of MPs by UF membranes when incorporating coagulation/flocculation pre-treatment, as well as their release during hydraulic and chemical cleaning. Polyethylene (PE) fragments, representing a range of environmentally relevant sizes (1-50 µm) and concentrations (907 ± 293 particles/L), were spiked into untreated lake waters prior to coagulation/flocculation-UF. Results suggest that in the absence of coagulant (alum) addition, only 50% of MPs retained during UF permeation were subsequently released during hydraulic cleaning. The release of MPs during hydraulic cleaning decreased (<20%) at medium and high (8 mg/L, 15 mg/L) alum dosages when compared to the absence of coagulant addition. Chemical cleaning with sodium hypochlorite (500 mg/L) was only capable of releasing 20% to 60% of retained MPs. Both hydraulic and chemical cleaning were less effective for the release of MPs when compared to reversible fouling resistance, organic matter, and aluminum. As such, future research is required to determine if the accumulation of MPs leads to increased UF fouling over extended operating periods, in addition cleaning practices which specifically target MPs should be further examined. Low and medium alum dosages (2 mg/L, 8 mg/L) were observed to increase the release of retained MPs during chemical cleaning, suggesting that incorporation of coagulation pre-treatment is useful to increase the release of MPs and minimize potential long-term accumulation on membranes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater ResearchSame topicMicroplastics and Plastic PollutionFrench-language works237,207