Financial Sector Performance and Environmental Sustainability: Assessing the Moderating Effect of Social Responsibility
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study explores the effect of FSEP on Environmental Performance (EPER) in Saudi Arabia's financial sector including a focus on the mediating role of FSSR on EPER.To investigate the hypothesized relationships, we collected primary from 512 employees working in the Saudi financial sector in Alkharj governorate, and SEM was used for hypothesis testing to conclude the results.We find that FSEP enhances both EPER and FSSR and also demonstrates that FSSR positively influences EPER.Furthermore, FSSR plays a significant mediating role as well.Which is strengthening the relationship between FSEP and EPER.These findings conclude the importance of integrating environmentally sustainable financial practices to accelerate economic sustainability and EPER in this sector.We suggest to the Saudi financial sector to further adopt green practices to achieve long-term economic and environmental sustainability in the long run.By reducing energy consumption and mitigating pollution from this sector, the Saudi financial sector can actively contribute to the nation's broader environmental sustainability goals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it