MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409209681 · doi:10.1186/s12912-025-03045-5

Advancing home health nursing competencies in Canada to reflect a dynamic care environment and complex population health needs: a modified eDelphi study

2025· article· en· W4409209681 on OpenAlexaffabout
Margaret Saari, Chelsea Coumoundouros, John Tadeo, Barbara Chyzzy, Melissa Northwood, Justine Giosa

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Nursing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDelphi Technique in Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooMcMaster UniversityToronto Metropolitan UniversityPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursing researchMedicineNursingNursing managementPopulation healthHealth careHealth informaticsHealth administrationPublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Home health nursing competencies outline the knowledge, skills and attributes home health nurses need for safe and ethical practice. Since the Canadian Home Health Nursing Competencies were first developed in 2010, several important contextual changes have occurred. To ensure competencies reflect current practice contexts, this study aimed to update Canada's home health nursing competencies. METHODS: A four-phase modified eDelphi study was conducted using online surveys, consensus meetings and feedback forms. An environmental scan was conducted to identify home health competencies emerging since 2010, to create a comprehensive set of preexisting competencies to serve as the starting point for a 3-round modified eDelphi process. The eDelphi was conducted with a panel of home health nurses (n = 43) to identify core competencies relevant to current home health nursing practice environments. Broader consultations with home health nurses (n = 41) and interdisciplinary home care team members (n = 12) were held to validate eDelphi findings. An advisory working group (n = 24) of home health nursing leaders provided guidance on study decision-making and final recommendations. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-nine preexisting competencies were consolidated into 96 unique home health nursing competencies. In Round 1 of the eDelphi, home health nurses reached consensus (agreement ≥ 75%) that 94 competencies were relevant to current practice environments and suggested five new competencies. Subsequent eDelphi rounds resulted in 93 competencies being brought forward as both relevant and essential for current home health nursing practice. Further consultations refined recommendations, resulting in a final set of 79 competencies. Qualitative feedback provided insights into the relevance and importance of competencies, opportunities for comprehension improvements, and implementation considerations. CONCLUSIONS: The home health nursing competency set generated through this study incorporates core concepts in home health nursing practice, such as evidence-informed practice and interdisciplinary collaboration, along with several new concepts, such as trauma-informed care, data-driven decision-making, and provision of culturally safe care. This updated competency set can be used to inform prelicensure education and professional development opportunities to enhance home health workforce capacity. Future work exploring strategies to support competency uptake in education and home and community care organizations is needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC NursingSame topicDelphi Technique in ResearchFrench-language works237,207