MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409211868 · doi:10.1113/jp286768

Volitional exercise elicits physiological and molecular improvements in the severe D2.mdx mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy

2025· article· en· W4409211868 on OpenAlexafffund
Stephanie R. Mattina, Sean Y. Ng, Andrew I. Mikhail, Derek W. Stouth, Cora E. Jornacion, Irena A. Rebalka, Thomas J. Hawke, Vladimir Ljubicic

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOntario Ministry of Economic Development, Job Creation and TradeMinistero dello Sviluppo EconomicoCanada Research ChairsMuscular Dystrophy Canada
KeywordsDuchenne muscular dystrophymdx mousesedEndocrinologyInternal medicineMedicineDystrophinBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is characterized by progressive muscle wasting and weakness. Prescribed moderate exercise in patients is beneficial, but concerns remain due to the vulnerability of dystrophic muscle to damage. Voluntary wheel running (VWR) is a self-regulated form of exercise that improves muscle health in the typical C57.mdx mouse model of DMD. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the impact of VWR in more severe and clinically relevant D2.mdx mice. Male D2.mdx animals were assigned to a sedentary (D2.mdx SED) or VWR group for 8-10 weeks, whereas DBA/2J wild-type mice served as healthy, sedentary controls (WT SED). Selective skeletal muscle mass and ex vivo force generation were elevated in D2.mdx animals that ran a relatively high volume (D2.mdx High VWR; 1.84 ± 0.84 km/day) compared to low-volume runners (D2.mdx Low VWR; 0.46 ± 0.31 km/day) and SED counterparts. VWR did not exacerbate the dystrophy, and instead attenuated the fibrotic profile compared to D2.mdx SED mice. A VWR-induced shift towards a more slow, oxidative phenotype was also observed. Mitochondrial respiration was reduced in D2.mdx SED animals versus WT SED mice but was partially restored following both Low and High VWR. Finally, a dose-dependent increase in the expression of mitochondrial proteins was observed following VWR, whereas markers of mitochondrial fusion were particularly elevated in D2.mdx High VWR mice. Our results indicate that VWR enhances muscle and mitochondrial biology in D2.mdx animals and further supports the therapeutic role of exercise for DMD patients. KEY POINTS: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a life-limiting neuromuscular disorder characterized by muscle weakness and wasting. Skeletal and cardiac muscle quality is compromised in the dystrophic condition. Exercise promotes functional and molecular adaptations in healthy individuals and mild dystrophic mouse models. However, the effects of exercise in more severe and clinically relevant models of DMD require investigation. A relatively high volume of voluntary wheel running (VWR) augmented selective muscle mass and muscle function without exacerbating the dystrophic pathology in D2.mdx mice. Volitional exercise normalized dystrophic skeletal muscle mitochondrial respiration and upregulated mitochondrial content compared to sedentary counterparts. A higher dose of VWR increased organelle fusion protein expression compared to both healthy and dystrophic sedentary animals, as well as D2.mdx mice that ran lower volumes. Our results provide evidence from a severe preclinical model that volitional exercise may be a safe and efficacious lifestyle-based intervention for DMD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicMuscle Physiology and DisordersFrench-language works237,207