MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409216326 · doi:10.1016/j.aej.2025.03.115

DSPCI-MTL: Dynamic split point computing in multi-task learning implementation with collaborative intelligence

2025· article· en· W4409216326 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlexandria Engineering Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTask (project management)Computer sciencePoint (geometry)Artificial intelligenceHuman–computer interactionEngineeringMathematicsSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have become a crucial technology in image processing, renowned for their ability to generate effective feature maps. The integration of DNNs within Internet of Things (IoT) environments, particularly in multi-task robots and swarm systems, has positioned them as vital components in various applications. However, their deployment in IoT devices frequently encounters challenges such as limited hardware capabilities, constrained bandwidth, prolonged data transmission times, and image packet loss due to transmission losses. To address these issues, this paper introduces the Multi-Task Learning (MTL) method of Collaborative Intelligence (CI) strategy by dynamically distributing computational tasks among edge devices and cloud. This method addresses the potential performance degradation caused by suboptimal computational splitting points of DNN for multiple tasks (segmentation, classification, depth estimation) and compensates for losses under varying network conditions and data sizes. A key innovation of our methodology is the introduction of a dynamic method to determine split points by computing DNN layers based on real-time bandwidth and data volume. In addition, an Auto Encoder (AE) architecture is implemented in the cloud to reconstruct image data packets lost during transmission based on feature map similarity measurements. Experimental results show that processing all transactions in the cloud with specific operational parameters reduces processing time by 38 % compared to traditional methods, while dynamically selecting the split point results in gains of up to 61 %. Furthermore, the proposed method achieves efficiency by reducing energy consumption by up to 50 % compared to cloud-only processing. It demonstrates robustness under varying network delays and reduces inference time by up to 47.5 % under low-latency conditions. In this regard, the innovative use of an AE for data loss reconstruction also shows significant potential in complex and long-distance images compared to traditional methods and gives promising results in improving data integrity and system performance. The results confirm the efficacy of the proposed architecture in real-time distributed processing and IoT-based smart systems. • A hybrid model based on MTL, and improved CI to efficient multi-task processing. • A method to dynamically optimize the split point in DNN architectures. • An Auto Encoder architecture to recover data lost during transmission. • Reduced processing time and energy usage as well as increased operational efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it