MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409229078 · doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcaf088

Respondence of steroid predicts the long-term clinical and endoscopic prognosis in Cronkhite–Canada syndrome

2025· article· en· W4409229078 on OpenAlex
Qiushi Xu, Chengzhu Ou, Yunfei Zhi, Runfeng Zhang, Shuang Liu, Tianming Xu, Hao Tang, Gechong Ruan, Xuemin Yan, Shengyu Zhang, Jingnan Li, Dong Wu, Ji Li

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueQJM · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangePrednisoneInternal medicineProportional hazards modelGastrointestinal bleedingLogistic regressionHazard ratioPediatricsSurgeryConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cronkhite-Canada syndrome (CCS) is a rare gastrointestinal polyposis syndrome characterized by hamartoma polyps and ectodermal abnormalities, with an increased risk of gastrointestinal cancers. Our previous study revealed its relapsing disease behavior and the improved long-term prognosis following the medications of steroids. However, the response of steroids varies among CCS patients, and there was no consensus about how to deal with steroid-dependent patients. AIM: This study aims to update the knowledge of long-term prognosis of CCS patients and explore the efficacy and safety of low-dose steroid as maintenance therapy. DESIGN: Observational cohort study comprising CCS patients hospitalized in Peking Union Medical College Hospital from 1999 until December 2023. METHODS: All CCS patients were followed up through telephone interviews and outpatient visits, with clinical data and endoscopic findings sequentially collected. The Cox regression model was used to identify factors associated with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 64 eligible participants were included with a median (interquartile range) follow-up duration of 49.5 (22.75, 101.25) months. The cumulative probability of overall survival (OS) was 90.2% at 3 years, 87.7% at 5 years, 78.6% at 10 years and relapse-free survival (RFS) after steroid treatment was 76.3% at 1 year, 62.9% at 3 years, 54.4% at 5 years, respectively. The poor response to steroids was identified as independent variable related to worse OS in multivariate model. In the subgroup analysis of relapsed patients, low-dose steroid treatment (prednisone ≤10 mg/day) for at least one year as maintenance therapy was in association with reduced risk of re-relapse (RFS: 72 (46.3, 78) vs. 12 (9, 15.5) months; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The long-term clinical outcomes of CCS are relatively favorable in patients who responded well to steroid treatment. The low-dose steroid maintenance therapy may prevent re-relapse of disease among CCS patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it