MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409235444 · doi:10.1002/smll.202502793

Precisely Modulating Oxygen Vacancies Via Heterovalent Ions Substitution in Spinel‐Structured Phosphor for Versatile Applications

2025· article· en· W4409235444 on OpenAlexaff
Yang Ding, Shuzeng Zhang, Zhixue Li, Chunhua Wang, Ning Han, Meijiao Liu, Qinan Mao, Jiasong Zhong

Bibliographic record

VenueSmall · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhosphorAfterglowLuminescenceMaterials scienceDopingSpinelIonPhotoluminescenceQuenching (fluorescence)OptoelectronicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)NanotechnologyChemistryFluorescenceOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rare‐earth ions doped phosphors have attracted great research interests owing to their versatile applications in optoelectronic fields. The phosphors often created atom vacancies because of the heterovalent substitution and different ion radii. However, how to previously modulate the defect concentration and position in ions doped phosphor is still a great challenge and significantly important for facilitating the optical applications. Herein, the accurate modulation of oxygen vacancies in spinel‐like ZnGa 2 O 4 phosphors is demonstrated via Eu 3+ doping for advanced temperature sensing and optical information encryption applications. The experimental results and first‐principle calculations confirmed that more Eu 3+ ions introduced into the lattice of ZnGa 2 O 4 can lead to the generation of high concentration of oxygen vacancies as well as much deeper and wider deficient states in its electronic bandgap, which therefore endow great potential for afterglow emission. The distinct luminescence quenching between Eu 3+ and oxygen vacancies at high temperatures verified outstanding luminescence intensity ratio modeled temperature sensing performance with maximum relative sensitivity ( S r ) value of 5.96% K −1 (@360 K) for ZnGa 2 O 4 :0.02Eu 3+ sample. Moreover, by virtue of the fantastic thermal‐induced afterglow luminescence, the dynamic optimal information encryption and anti‐counterfeiting over the ZnGa 2 O 4 :Eu 3+ phosphor have been also achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.636

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSmallSame topicLuminescence Properties of Advanced MaterialsFrench-language works237,207