MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409235627 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000212699

Do We Agree? Patient and Clinician Ratings of Head Tremor Severity in Botulinum Toxin-treated Isolated Cervical Dystonia (P10-5.028)

2025· article· en· W4409235627 on OpenAlexaff
Amy Lin, Raphael Pamintuan, Minnie P. Luu, Richard L. Barbano, Brian D. Berman, Jeanne Feuerstein, Hyder A. Jinnah, Davide Martino, Joel S. Perlmutter, Aparna Wagle Shukla, Cynthia Comella, Glenn T. Stebbins, Sarah Pirio Richardson, David Peterson

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Biological SciencesUniversity of CalgaryCentre for Movement Disorders
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCervical dystoniaBotulinum toxinDystoniaMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationTorticollisHead traumaAnesthesiaSurgeryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compare a novel patient-reported outcome with a clinician-reported assessment of head tremor severity in isolated cervical dystonia (CD).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.053
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.053
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207