Life-Threatening Effects of Bronchiolitis Related to Electronic Cigarette Use
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bronchiolitis, characterized by inflammation of the bronchioles, presents significant health risks, particularly to infants, the elderly, and those with preexisting respiratory conditions. Traditionally associated with viral infections, bronchiolitis has recently been linked to electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use, a trend that has surged in popularity over the past decade. While e-cigarettes are often marketed as safer alternatives to traditional smoking and are seen as viable tools for smoking cessation, emerging evidence suggests they may contribute to the onset or exacerbation of bronchiolitis and other respiratory conditions.To address these concerns, we recommend a prescription model for e-cigarettes, particularly in the context of smoking cessation. This model would involve prescribing the minimum effective dose of e-liquid, tailored to individual factors such as age, gender, and health status, to reduce the risk of adverse effects. Additionally, developing a screening tool to assess the risk of e-cigarette or vaping-associated lung injury (EVALI) is crucial before recommending e-cigarettes as a cessation aid. Furthermore, we propose the implementation of a physical alert system, similar to those used for steroid or anticoagulant medications, to track the specific substances in e-liquids. This would aid clinicians in swift diagnosis and management. As the e-cigarette market continues to grow, careful regulation and further research are essential to prevent the public health consequences seen in the tobacco industry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".