Deep Learning Applications in Imaging of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Narrative Summary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, requiring swift and precise clinical decisions based on neuroimaging. Recent advances in deep learning-based computer vision and language artificial intelligence (AI) models have demonstrated transformative performance for several stroke-related applications. Purpose To evaluate deep learning applications for imaging in AIS in adult patients, providing a comprehensive overview of the current state of the technology and identifying opportunities for advancement. Materials and Methods A systematic literature review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search of four databases from January 2016 to January 2024 was performed, targeting deep learning applications for imaging of AIS, including automated detection of large vessel occlusion and measurement of Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score. Articles were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, focusing on convolutional neural networks and transformers. The top-represented areas were addressed, and the relevant information was extracted and summarized. Results Of 380 studies included, 171 (45.0%) focused on stroke lesion segmentation, 129 (33.9%) on classification and triage, 31 (8.2%) on outcome prediction, 15 (3.9%) on generative AI and large language models, and 11 (2.9%) on rapid or low-dose imaging specific to stroke applications. Detailed data extraction was performed for 68 studies. Public AIS datasets are also highlighted, for researchers developing AI models for stroke imaging. Conclusion Deep learning applications have permeated AIS imaging, particularly for stroke lesion segmentation. However, challenges remain, including the need for standardized protocols and test sets, larger public datasets, and performance validation in real-world settings. © RSNA, 2025
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".