MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409244438 · doi:10.1148/radiol.240775

Deep Learning Applications in Imaging of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Narrative Summary

2025· review· en· W4409244438 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bin Jiang, Nancy Pham, Eric K. van Staalduinen, Yongkai Liu, Sanaz Nazari‐Farsani, Amirhossein Sanaat, Henk van Voorst, Ates Fettahoglu, Dong‐Hoon Kim, Jiahong Ouyang, Ashwin Kumar, Aditya Srivatsan, Ramy Hussein, Maarten G. Lansberg, Fernando E. Boada, Greg Zaharchuk

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Deep learningAcute strokeIschemic strokeSegmentationNarrative reviewArtificial intelligenceLesionTest (biology)Medical physicsIschemiaIntensive care medicineInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, requiring swift and precise clinical decisions based on neuroimaging. Recent advances in deep learning-based computer vision and language artificial intelligence (AI) models have demonstrated transformative performance for several stroke-related applications. Purpose To evaluate deep learning applications for imaging in AIS in adult patients, providing a comprehensive overview of the current state of the technology and identifying opportunities for advancement. Materials and Methods A systematic literature review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search of four databases from January 2016 to January 2024 was performed, targeting deep learning applications for imaging of AIS, including automated detection of large vessel occlusion and measurement of Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score. Articles were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, focusing on convolutional neural networks and transformers. The top-represented areas were addressed, and the relevant information was extracted and summarized. Results Of 380 studies included, 171 (45.0%) focused on stroke lesion segmentation, 129 (33.9%) on classification and triage, 31 (8.2%) on outcome prediction, 15 (3.9%) on generative AI and large language models, and 11 (2.9%) on rapid or low-dose imaging specific to stroke applications. Detailed data extraction was performed for 68 studies. Public AIS datasets are also highlighted, for researchers developing AI models for stroke imaging. Conclusion Deep learning applications have permeated AIS imaging, particularly for stroke lesion segmentation. However, challenges remain, including the need for standardized protocols and test sets, larger public datasets, and performance validation in real-world settings. © RSNA, 2025

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.005
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiologySame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207