Structural Development of Speech Networks in Young Children: A Cross-Sectional Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract To investigate speech in the developing brain, 94 children aged 4 to 7 years old were scanned using diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) magnetic resonance imaging. To increase sample size and performance variability, we included children with ADHD from a larger ongoing study (n = 47). Each child completed the Syllable Repetition Task (SRT), a validated measure of phoneme articulation. DWI data were modeled using restriction spectrum imaging to measure restricted and hindered diffusion properties in gray and white matter. We analyzed the diffusion data using whole brain analysis and automated fiber quantification (AFQ) analysis to establish tract profiles for the six fiber pathways thought to be important for supporting speech development. In the whole brain analysis, we found that SRT performance was associated with restricted diffusion in left and right inferior frontal gyrus, left and right pars opercularis, right pre-supplementary and supplementary motor area, and left and right cerebellar gray matter (p < 0.005). Age moderated these associations in left pars opercularis and the frontal aslant tract (FAT), but only the cerebellar findings survived a cluster correction. Analyses using AFQ highlighted differences in high and low performing children along specific tract profiles, most notably in left but not right FAT, in left and right superior longitudinal fasciculus III, and in the cerebellar peduncles. These findings suggest that individual differences in speech performance are reflected in structural gray and white matter differences as measured by restricted and hindered diffusion metrics, and offer important insights into developing brain networks supporting speech in very young children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".