Vanishing bile duct syndrome in drug-induced liver injury: clinical and pathologic perspectives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vanishing bile duct syndrome (VBDS) is a rare condition, representing approximately 0.5% of small bile duct diseases, characterized by progressive destruction of intrahepatic bile ducts, leading to ductopenia. This condition encompasses various etiologies, with drug-induced VBDS (D-VBDS) accounting for 7% of VBDS cases. D-VBDS arises from liver injury due to chemical drugs, traditional medicines, and dietary supplements, often resulting in inflammatory responses and necrosis of bile duct epithelium. Recent years have seen a rise in reported cases, making drug-related injuries a leading cause of acute liver failure in Western countries. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of VBDS, focusing on the histopathological features of acute and chronic D-VBDS, alongside exploring its clinical presentation, prognostic implications, and future research directions. Understanding the diverse etiologies, clinical manifestations, and biochemical parameters associated with D-VBDS is essential for improving diagnosis, treatment strategies, and patient outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".