MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409253571 · doi:10.1117/12.3048813

Experimental investigation of direct-indirect flat-panel imager using tellurium doped amorphous selenium

2025· article· en· W4409253571 on OpenAlexaff
Corey Orlik, Adrian Howansky, Sébastien Léveillé, Salman M. Arnab, Jann Stavro, Scott Dow, Amir H. Goldan, Safa Kasap, Kenkichi Tanioka, Wei Zhao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced optical system design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanAnalogic (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelluriumSeleniumDopingMaterials scienceAmorphous solidOpticsOptoelectronicsPhysicsChemistryMetallurgyCrystallography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Active matrix flat panel imagers (AMFPIs) are widely used in digital radiography, but direct and indirect conversion technologies each have limitations. Direct conversion detectors suffer from low x-ray quantum efficiency, while indirect conversion detectors experience spatial resolution degradation due to optical photon scatter. A direct-indirect “Hybrid” AMFPI, which combines both technologies, has previously shown potential to address these limitations. This hybrid design includes an amorphous selenium (a-Se) layer in contact with a scintillator, functioning as both an x-ray and optical sensor. This study builds on the first Hybrid AMFPI prototype, aiming to improve its detective quantum efficiency (DQE). Two key enhancements were explored: (1) increasing the a-Se layer thickness and (2) improving optical quantum efficiency (OQE) through tellurium (Te) doping. A 6.5 x 6.5 cm² prototype was fabricated with 700 μm a-Se, a Te-doped a-Se optical sensing layer, and a removable 1000 μm CsI:Tl scintillator. The Hybrid configuration showed a 42% (RQA5) and 91% (RQA9) increase in x-ray sensitivity compared to the direct AMFPI, attributed to an approximate tenfold improvement in OQE due to Te doping. The Hybrid achieved a DQE(0) of 0.90 (RQA5) and 0.75 (RQA9), marking it the highest-performing imager for digital radiography applications at RQA9. Preliminary real-time imaging (i.e., 30 frames-per-second) temporal performance measurements indicated minimal ghosting (below 2%) but up to 12% lag, attributed to electron trapping in the Te-doped layer. Future research will explore co-doping with arsenic to enhance electron transport to allow for real-time imaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced optical system designFrench-language works237,207