MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409257386 · doi:10.1109/tmc.2025.3558793

Plugging and Breathing on the Air: A Practical Defense System for Deep Learning-Based Wireless Semantic Communications

2025· article· en· W4409257386 on OpenAlexaff
Chenyang Qiu, Guoshun Nan, Wu Deng, Yufan Zhang, Yuchong Gao, Dongfang Wang, Meng Qu, Zhuoran Duan, Qian Sun, Qimei Cui, Xiaodong Xu, Xiaofeng Tao, Tony Q. S. Quek

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsMila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Beijing MunicipalityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Research Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceWirelessArtificial intelligenceComputer securityMultimediaTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep learning-based semantic communications (DLSC) leverage deep neural networks in transmitters and receivers, pushing the boundaries beyond Shannon limit. However, DLSC is extremely vulnerable to malicious physical-layer adversarial attacks due to the openness of wireless channels. Meanwhile, existing defense approaches still suffer from two challenges for robust DLSC. First, most methods require offline DLSC retraining to defend against various attacks, causing interruptions of online service. Second, they struggle to achieve effective defense in real-world time-varying channels, thus limiting DLSC reliability. We propose PBNet, integrating a pluggable protector and an adaptive protector to respectively address the above two challenges. First, the pluggable protector utilizes a novel denoising module to safeguard the transmitted signals, enabling hot-pluggable deployment without interrupting communication. Second, the adaptive protector leverages a novel alternating adaption strategy to achieve effective defense in time-varying channels, ensuring robust performances under real-world dynamic conditions. Evaluations involving symbols, images, texts, and speeches show the efficacy of our PBNet, which has respectively achieved an impressive 72.22% and 73.71% accuracy improvement in defending against unknown <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$l_{0}$</tex-math></inline-formula>-norm and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$l_{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula>-norm attacks on image-based DLSC. Furthermore, we developed two real-world radio systems of PBNet to perform over-the-air signal generation, integrating hardware and software such as FPGA chips and GNU radio. We also implemented an interactive UI of PBNet based on QT5, aiming to demonstrate the effect of attacks and defense visually. This work achieves robust DLSC performances under various attacks and time-varying channels, taking a significant step towards the practical defense scheme for robust DLSC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Mobile ComputingSame topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207