High Ki-67 expression is associated with increased risk of distant recurrence in Oncotype Dx low risk breast cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess whether high Ki-67 protein expression level could independently predict the distant recurrence in early-stage breast cancer with low Oncotype Dx scores (≤ 25). METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 278 patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-), T1-2N0M0, low Oncotype Dx recurrence score (RS) (≤ 25) breast cancer. We identified 2 groups: "high Ki-67″ ≥ 15% (n = 130, 47%) and "low Ki-67″ < 15% (n = 148, 53%). Clinical characteristics, treatment and survival were abstracted from chart review. Fisher's exact test was used to assess differences between Ki-67 groups. Cox-regression models were used to assess differences in survival. RESULTS: After a median follow up of 7 years, 13 (4.7%) patients experienced distant metastasis. Recurrence rate was significantly higher in the "high Ki-67″ group 9.2% (12/130) versus the "low Ki-67″ group 0.7% (1/148) (P = .001). Distant metastasis-free survival (dMFS) was significantly shorter in the "high Ki-67″ group (HR 12.90, 95% CI, 12.53-13.27, P = .008). Tumor size ≥ 2 cm was associated with shorter dMFS (HR, 12.90; 95% CI, 12.53-13.27; P < .001). In a multivariable analysis, tumor size ≥ 2 cm and "High Ki-67″ were independent prognosis factors for dMFS. CONCLUSION: Ki-67 expression level may help to identify a subset of low risk Oncotype Dx patients who could benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".