MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409259182 · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2025.107387

Board diversity and the timing of drug recalls: Implications for public health and shareholder value

2025· article· en· W4409259182 on OpenAlexaff
Keeyoon Noh

Bibliographic record

VenueFinance research letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Diversity and Inequality
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShareholder valueDiversity (politics)Value (mathematics)ShareholderPublic healthBusinessEconomicsMedicineCorporate governancePolitical scienceFinanceStatisticsMathematicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the influence of board diversity on firms’ strategic decision-making and shareholder value, analyzing pharmaceutical companies’ responses to adverse event reports. Employing duration analysis, we find that firms with higher proportions of foreign and female directors on their boards are significantly more likely to issue prompt recalls following adverse event reports. Additionally, our results demonstrate that delayed recalls by firms with less diverse boards lead to substantial negative stock returns. These findings underscore the importance of board diversity in enhancing public health protection and reducing financial risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.405
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.021 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFinance research lettersSame topicGender Diversity and InequalityFrench-language works237,207