A Multitask CNN for Near-Infrared Probe: Enhanced Real-Time Breast Cancer Imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The early detection of breast cancer, particularly in dense breast tissues, faces significant challenges with traditional imaging techniques such as mammography. This study utilizes a Near-infrared Scan (NIRscan) probe and an advanced convolutional neural network (CNN) model to enhance tumor localization accuracy and efficiency. CNN processed data from 133 breast phantoms into 266 samples using data augmentation techniques, such as mirroring. The model significantly improved image reconstruction, achieving an RMSE of 0.0624, MAE of 0.0360, R2 of 0.9704, and Fuzzy Jaccard Index of 0.9121. Subsequently, we introduced a multitask CNN that reconstructs images and classifies them based on depth, length, and health status, further enhancing its diagnostic capabilities. This multitasking approach leverages the robust feature extraction capabilities of CNNs to perform complex tasks simultaneously, thereby improving the model’s efficiency and accuracy. It achieved exemplary classification accuracies in depth (100%), length (92.86%), and health status, with a perfect F1 Score. These results highlight the promise of NIRscan technology, in combination with a multitask CNN model, as a supportive tool for improving real-time breast cancer screening and diagnostic workflows.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".