MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409266088 · doi:10.33424/futurum576

What can seismic waves tell us about Earth’s history?

2025· article· en· W4409266088 on OpenAlexaffabout
F. A. Darbyshire

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSeismology and Earthquake Studies
Canadian institutionsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarth (classical element)GeologySeismologyGeophysicsHistoryPhysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

What can seismic waves tell us about Earth's history?Studying the hidden structure of our planet is essential for understanding Earth's geological past and predicting its future.Dr Fiona Darbyshire, a seismologist at the Université du Québec à Montréal in Canada, is using seismic waves to model Earth's rocky, outer layer and investigate the processes that have shaped our continents over billions of years.Seismology Talk like a... seismologist PROFILE Crust -the thin, outermost layer of Earth, made of solid rock and forming the continents and ocean floors Lithosphere -the rigid outer layer of Earth, made up of the crust and part of the upper mantle Mantle -the layer beneath the Earth's crust, consisting of hot rock that, although solid, moves slowly over geological time Seismograph -an instrument used to detect and record seismic waves Seismometer -the specific part of the seismograph that detects ground movement Seismic waves -vibrations that travel through Earth's interior, caused by various sources like earthquakes or explosionsTectonic activity -the movement and interaction of Earth's tectonic plates, which causes earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and the formation of mountains Mantle plume -a column of hot, buoyant rock rising from deep within the Earth's mantle that can cause volcanic activity and affect the lithosphere

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.008
Scholarly communication0.0050.018
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismology and Earthquake StudiesFrench-language works237,207