MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409267724 · doi:10.3390/jfmk10020124

Elderly Hip Osteoarthritis: A Review of Short-Term Pain Relief Through Non-Weight-Bearing Therapies

2025· review· en· W4409267724 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Olivia Norato, Sarah Velez, Gordon Lam, Glory Udechi, Edwin Cung, Jean‐Philippe Berteau

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisMedicineHip painPain reliefWeight-bearingTerm (time)Physical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationSurgeryAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Older individuals with hip osteoarthritis (OA) who have difficulty walking, climbing stairs, or performing daily tasks often find non-weight-bearing (NWB) exercises essential for rebuilding strength and preserving function without further stressing the joints. In addition, those with a higher body mass index (BMI) particularly benefit from NWB therapy, as it alleviates joint pressure while facilitating safe and effective rehabilitation. Thus, NWB interventions, such as manual therapy (MT) and aquatic therapy (AT), are especially critical for older adults aged 60 and above, offering pain relief and functional improvement by minimizing gravitational impact on the hip joint. This review examines the effectiveness of these approaches in managing hip OA symptoms and decreasing pain. The inclusion criteria for the study consisted of randomized controlled trials or controlled trials focused on adult patients with primary osteoarthritis of the hip joint, utilizing interventions such as MT (including thrust joint mobilizations, non-thrust/oscillatory mobilizations, and soft tissue mobilization) or AT (including hydrotherapy and water therapy), and assessing outcomes related to pain. We selected nine studies that included a total of n = 1037 individuals. It evaluated outcomes such as self-reported pain levels using measures like the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Beyond statistical differences, both therapies were evaluated for Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID). While MT studies indicated a decrease in pain according to pain index scores, they showed short-term effectiveness till five weeks but lacked sustained clinical efficacy beyond this period. AT showed positive results within a ten-week period, although its effectiveness seemed to level off beyond this duration, falling below the threshold of clinical efficiency. After 10 weeks of treatment, there is no discernible clinical benefit in terms of pain reduction. Both interventions without gravitational impact seem suitable for providing short-term pain relief for primary hip osteoarthritis patients, but long-term pain relief—meaning after ten weeks—should be maintained through therapeutic exercise and patient education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Functional Morphology and KinesiologySame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207