MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409268978 · doi:10.5334/jcr.245

Mini review: Bidirectional Regulation of Circadian Rhythm by Suprachiasmatic Nucleus and Nuclear Receptors in Female Mammals

2025· review· en· W4409268978 on OpenAlexaff
Dharani Abirama Sundari Shanmugam, Ashwini Devi Balaraman, Abhijit Kar, Abigail B Franco, Shanmugam Meenakumari, P K Praveenkumar, Vinoth Kumar Ganesan, Merugumolu Vijay Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Circadian Rhythms · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCircadian rhythm and melatonin
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuprachiasmatic nucleusCircadian rhythmNeuroscienceRhythmBiologyNuclear receptorBiological clockHuman physiologyPhysiologyMedicineInternal medicineEndocrinologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The anterior region of the hypothalamus accommodates a bilateral structure called the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), which controls, modulates, and perpetuates the homeostasis of circadian rhythm and sleep hormone release. These SCN have a predominance over multitudinous peripheral tissues like the uterus, liver, intestine, pancreas, endocrine system, immune system, reproductive system, and cardiovascular system. This peripheral clock acts as a pacemaker for circadian rhythm timing, which regulates crucial metabolic pathways and organizes numerous activities in the female reproductive network of mammals. The circadian CLOCK genes are expressed in various reproductive organs. The CLOCK, BMAL1, CRY, and PER genes harmonize the balance and manifestation of nuclear receptors (NRs) expression, and the other way round, NRs regulate these circadian genes. Several NRs, in particular estrogen, progesterone, androgen, and PPARs, nurture the ovary and uterus. Bidirectional coordination between SCN and NRs maintains the circadian rhythm of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis of the female reproductive organs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Circadian RhythmsSame topicCircadian rhythm and melatoninFrench-language works237,207