MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409276114 · doi:10.17116/jnevro202512503157

Relationship between stroke-associated pneumonia and long-term outcomes of ischemic stroke

2025· article· en· W4409276114 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
I.N. Dolgova, L.V. Santikova, D.T. Chipova

Bibliographic record

VenueS S Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBarthel indexInternal medicineNeurological deficitStroke (engine)Diabetes mellitusPneumoniaMontreal Cognitive AssessmentDiseaseCognitive deficitCognitive impairmentPneumonia severity indexPediatricsPhysical therapyActivities of daily livingSurgeryCommunity-acquired pneumoniaEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP) and long-term outcomes of ischemic stroke (IS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 95 patients with acute IS; Group 1 included 41 patients with SAP history; Group 2 included 54 patients without infectious complications in the acute period of IS. The severity of neurological deficit, the ability to self-care (NIHSS scale, Barthel Index), and the state of cognitive functions (MMSE, MoCA scales) were assessed at hospitalization, on days 5 and 11 of IS, after 6 and 12 months. Blood cell composition, neutrophils/monocytes ratio (NMR), and C-reactive protein were also assessed. RESULTS: <0.05 for all conditions). Patients with SAP have a significantly higher hospital mortality and a more severe neurological deficit and cognitive impairment at discharge. After 6 months, the severity of neurological and cognitive impairment in patients with and without SAP was not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The presence of SAP slows down the recovery of impaired functions in patients with IS for six months from the onset of the disease. NMR is a sensitive marker of SAP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueS S Korsakov Journal of Neurology and PsychiatrySame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207